Simulation Evidence

Examining the clues that suggest our reality might be a sophisticated computer simulation

Important Disclaimer

The evidence presented here is speculative and based on theoretical interpretations of scientific observations. While these ideas are fascinating to consider, they do not constitute definitive proof that we live in a simulation. The simulation hypothesis remains a philosophical thought experiment that cannot be conclusively proven or disproven with our current understanding of physics and technology.

Quantum Mechanics
  • Observer Effect: Particles exist in a superposition of states until observed, similar to how video games only render what the player is looking at to save processing power.
  • Quantum Entanglement: Einstein called it "spooky action at a distance" - particles can be instantly connected regardless of distance, suggesting a shared underlying computational framework.
  • Double-Slit Experiment: Particles behave differently when observed, potentially indicating that reality is rendered differently when "players" are watching.
Physical Constants
  • Fine-Tuning: The fundamental constants of physics (like the gravitational constant) appear precisely calibrated to allow for complex structures and life.
  • Planck Units: The existence of minimum units of measurement (Planck length, Planck time) could represent the "pixels" or resolution of our simulation.
  • Speed of Light: The universal speed limit could be a processing constraint of the simulation, preventing objects from moving faster than the simulation can compute their positions.
"What is real? How do you define real?"

While none of these observations definitively prove we live in a simulation, they collectively present an intriguing case that our reality might not be as fundamental as we assume.